3 ms·
On the contrary: most people who had an opinion were interested in something other than sysvinit. It's just that we all have different ideas about what that is
by dsr_ 5y ago
On the contrary: most people who had an opinion were interested in something other than sysvinit.
It's just that we all have different ideas about what that is.
daemontools-style supervisors are what I prefer, myself. I also acknowledge that there isn't a clear winner in that space.
What I object to are people enforcing systemd by making it a requirement for other projects.
- specialist 5y ago> ...It's just that we all have different ideas about what that is. This in a nutshell is why all progress is always a god awful painful mess. No matter how modest. I used to be self-proclaimed advocate for change. Technological, organizational, political, all of it. Everyone marching arm-in-arm towards our glorious future. Now I'm happy when any one manages to change anything at all. I no longer even care how good or bad an idea is. Better to try and then learn from failure than never try at all.
- pjz 5y agoExactly: Any _individual_ change may or may not be good - but change _in general_ is good, because without it there's no chance of getting better. And any hope of improvement is infinitely better than no hope of improvement.