2 ms·
ColdFusion devs aren't cheap either, and that's definitely not a popular language these days. It's not that devs are necessary expensive, it's that senior devs
by bdcravens 5y ago
ColdFusion devs aren't cheap either, and that's definitely not a popular language these days.
It's not that devs are necessary expensive, it's that senior devs are. The problem being that "easy" languages can often lead to complex balls of mud if care is not taken, and the only way forward is to hire senior devs.
- b20000 5y agoweird. i’ve seen situations where there are very few developers in the world with a specific skill. yet, because there are few companies that need that skill relatively, these developers cannot demand rates higher than rates for developers dealing in vanilla shit like javascript.
- bdcravens 5y agoThe rates might not be higher, but more to the point, their rates aren't lower either. Thus the idea that popularity correlates with pay isn't necessarily true.
- b20000 5y agoright. you would think that the number of open jobs would be an indication of the rates you can command as the reasoning is that they are not filled because there is no supply.
- joelbluminator 5y agoMy Linkedin shows 37444 Ruby jobs in the U.S to 488 ColdFusion jobs. I don't think this comparison makes sense at all...
- bdcravens 5y agoThe point was whether popularity correlates with pay. Popularity on a given job site neither proves nor disproves that point.