3 ms·
> The difference is when it's an institution (private versus public schools for example), that's pretty easy to disagree over. One side does not believe the oth
by icecap12 5y ago
> The difference is when it's an institution (private versus public schools for example), that's pretty easy to disagree over. One side does not believe the other is inherently evil and a 'lesser' person. When it's about individual rights, and an attack on you as a person, and your inherent rights as an individual, that is almost impossible to overcome.
I think you articulated it far better than me. Certain things I could hardly care what another person says or thinks on the matter. But on certain issues or rights if there's a fundamental disagreement, I find the opposing position not just in direct opposition, but in a way actively working to undermine my position. I can't be friends with someone when there's such a basic difference in values; if we don't agree on that, there might not be much else we agree on.
- jdavis703 5y agoSure, I too won’t be friends who don’t want me or my friends to exist in society. But this kind of bigotry is rarely presented as “abolishment.” The only thing I can think of is folks who think that various Offices of Civil Rights should be abolished — but this is a fairly uncommon culture war talking point in this century.