>Why is Apple 'revolutionary'?? Personally, I don't think they are. A revolution requires an 'overthrow of a government or social order for a new system'. I co

>Why is Apple 'revolutionary'?? Personally, I don't think they are. A revolution requires an 'overthrow of a government or social order for a new system'. I couldn't disagree more. Look at the impact of the iPhone. Motorola, Nokia, Palm, RIM and Windows Mobile have either changed their business, their impact on the marketplace has been greatly reduced or are out of business. This is the effect of a revolution. Had the iPhone not been revolutionary there wouldn't have been this kind of disruption in the market and it wouldn't have taken years for other OSes to catch up. This is the same for the iPad. HP, the largest PC maker, has left the business and cited the iPad as one of the main reasons.