It was a bit brusque. I think that's the word you're looking for. If that's what bad faith means to you (which still seems a stretch of the definition so you ca

It was a bit brusque. I think that's the word you're looking for. If that's what bad faith means to you (which still seems a stretch of the definition so you can get the guidelines invoked and win the internet) then both sides of the discussion are guilty of this. On the other side of the aisle, we have people pointing out that there aren't any interesting dApps, with the reply being: "Sure there are! Here's a list dApps that are just more layers on moving cryptocurrency!" That's only interesting if you assume the blockchain is valuable and interesting. This is a circular argument. Do you have anything better? "Sure do! Here's a list dApps that are just more layers on moving cryptocurrency! Register on this site to hear me talk about NFTs!" Is that "bad faith" too? I don't think so. There's a divide though, and it's a tiresome one. Some of us think the emperor has no clothes. Others think they are the best clothes ever. We probably all need our eyes checked.