4 ms·
its a working compiler, so why not?
by 0xDEEPFAC 5y ago
its a working compiler, so why not?
- Jtsummers 5y agoIt’s a glorified sed script with a forked version of GCC from April 1st. It’s a joke.
- 0xDEEPFAC 5y agoIt is not? As the creator I can tell you that the parser and analyzer of GCC/GNAT were modified. For example, supporting implicit "use" clauses for packages was a difficult problem to solve - not to mention allowing for abbreviated type names in the Standard package.