4 ms·
If you don't legally have access to the platform, you have no claim on license enforcement. The platform wasn't officially launched, and the accounts were used
by rubyist5eva 5y ago
If you don't legally have access to the platform, you have no claim on license enforcement.
The platform wasn't officially launched, and the accounts were used by exploiting a misconfigured page.
They are under no obligation to release the source code, yet.
- vntok 5y agoExactly. Truth Social could actually sue any one claiming they used the platform for abusing a security flaw to obtain and maintain access to a protected computer system. That would be hilarious.
- rubyist5eva 5y agoThere might even also be a case for libel.
- Chris2048 5y ago> the accounts were used by exploiting a misconfigured page This is an important detail; is this absolutely proven?
- im3w1l 5y agohttps://www.dailydot.com/debug/hacker-trump-truth-social/ https://www.dailydot.com/debug/hacker-trump-truth-social/ > Armed with the app developer’s name, the hacker told the Daily Dot that they were able to utilize Shodan, a search engine that locates servers exposed to the open internet, to track down the company’s digital footprint. > The hacker was able to locate numerous web domains as a result, including one that appeared to be running the mobile beta for Truth Social. > News of the public website quickly spread across social media after making its way to Canadian hacker Aubrey “Kirtaner” Cottle, who was able to set up faux accounts for numerous high-profile individuals such as QAnon guru Ron Watkins. Whether that counts as misconfigured idk, but these are certainly not normal users doing normal user things.