Maybe you're right. But: 1) I was involved, I am no longer involved, despite, as mentioned, I still have a vested interest in the company. 2) We had an opport

Maybe you're right. But: 1) I was involved, I am no longer involved, despite, as mentioned, I still have a vested interest in the company. 2) We had an opportunity to do an ICO in 2017/2018, and we didn't, because we've been sick of the crypto bullshit long before most others have been, and because we wanted to build a serious business, not a scam. 3) It's actually a clever way to use the Blockchain for something useful (transactions as public proof, and tokens as unique identifiers that hold property of a trust, all perfectly compatible with the existing legal structure). I think it's unfair to quickly downvote someone just because of a general sentiment. I was trying to contribute to the conversation, and I also had a disclaimer of my involvement with the company I was citing. Anyway. I'll just keep disagreeing with the few that decided to downvote me.