3 ms·
Foundations series as a whole was relatively lite. Characters aren't that sophisticated as what you get in GoT, Dune, or Tolkiens. Screen adaptations are mostly
by Jansen312 5y ago
Foundations series as a whole was relatively lite. Characters aren't that sophisticated as what you get in GoT, Dune, or Tolkiens. Screen adaptations are mostly to target a different kind of audience. People who loves the original books aren't the intended target. The mass who have heard of Asimov but didn't bother to read or just read the back of the book would be the main audience for this Foundations. It is currently way better than the finale of GoT.
- rockemsockem 5y agoStrong disagree. This is one of the worst shows I've ever watched. Lots of magical story elements that just poof out of nowhere at just the right time. On top of that there's ton of useless scenes where literally nothing important to anything is on screen for over a minute. The show-runner helped make Batman vs Superman and I see LOTS of that awful movie in Foundation.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- ssully 5y ago"Lots of magical story elements that just poof out of nowhere at just the right time." Have you read Foundation recently? That is literally how almost half (or more) of the conflicts in the first book get resolved!