3 ms·
I agree, with one caveat. There's always a chance that the organizations issuing these "stablecoins" pull off something analogous to what Nixon did when he ende
by cs702 5y ago
I agree, with one caveat. There's always a chance that the organizations issuing these "stablecoins" pull off something analogous to what Nixon did when he ended the convertibility of the US Dollar into gold, making it impossible, in fact illegal, for anyone to call up the US Treasury and request that they exchange a bunch of dollars with gold from Fort Knox.[a]
Many so-called "gold bugs" and "Austrian School economists" predicted the transition to a non-convertible dollar would surely lead to monetary and economic disaster... but so far, they've been wrong: Things have actually worked remarkably well for half a century.
Could Bitfinex pull off something like that? I'm not sure, but I wouldn't rule it out 100%.
[a] https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/gold-convertibility-ends https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/gold-convertibi...
- ElderMillennial 5y agoCitation needed. The last 40 years have been a period of high inflation, shrinking (real) wages, and "shrinkflation" losses in quality of life. One could argue that this has happened precisely because financial institutions can invent "wealth" independent of creating things with intrinsic value through labor/industry -- leaving an unproductive segment of society nominally wealthy by fabricating dollars for themselves. For example, in the past two years, "elites" have handed themselves trillions in fabricated dollars. Something that couldn't happen, if dollars were gold backed.