I never like the arguments that state we should not care about `a` because `b` and `c` are equally bad or worse and we have done nothing about them. Can we jus

I never like the arguments that state we should not care about `a` because `b` and `c` are equally bad or worse and we have done nothing about them. Can we just talk about an issue as its own issue? Maybe `b` and `c` are really hard to solve, but `a` is easy to solve. Many arguments against action are usually framed in this comparison structure - I think it is a weak argument unless you explain why `b` and `c` out prioritize `a` for shared resources.