5 ms·

> Compared with what? I really don't get what is the glitch here? You seem fixated on finding logical parallels to an ongoing response to a global pandemic, wh

> Compared with what? I really don't get what is the glitch here? You seem fixated on finding logical parallels to an ongoing response to a global pandemic, which is honestly getting quite repetitive to discuss. It's compared with the current level of deaths to vaccination rate given it's not going away.. The logical conclusion of unsurprising policies as a response to the novel coronavirus, or any highly transmissible zoonotic virus. Are we even on the same page here that less deaths is better from the perspective of public policy? Honestly your rhetoric, message after message gets so tiresome to engage with, by virtue of hyperbolic it is. "Relentless propaganda", "daring to have different opinions gets you attacked bullied fired etc etc". It's a national healthcare apparatus' response to a virus, nothing more or less. After reading it all, repeating it every which way, it's just not compelling to me. This doesn't need to be some hyper-emotional, hyper-politicized topic, where parents of young boys need to fearfully victimize themselves as patriot-martyr enemies of the fascist state. I'm getting to the point of having a kind of second-hand embarrassment at the characterization.

throwawaylinux 5y ago
> I really don't get what is the glitch here? The glitch? The glitch is getting you to complete your ideas and form a coherent response. > You seem fixated on finding logical parallels to an ongoing response to a global pandemic, which is honestly getting quite repetitive to discuss. I'm fixated because I posted some questions in a covid thread that doesn't mindlessly toe the line, and that's exhausting you? I rather think you would be less upset in the end if you just conceded you don't have good answers. Sometimes it's okay to admit you don't know everything. This flustered incoherent rambling is what's embarrassing and exposes you as incapable of addressing what I wrote just as surely as a simple admission would have. With the additional benefit of the latter being retaining some dignity. The entire thread is here plain as day for anybody to read, and the point is still floating around happily well above your head: > Are we even on the same page here that less deaths is better from the perspective of public policy? So what to do about the overweight person question. I know you're getting flustered and angry because you can't answer it, so you're just pretending it's not relevant or it's somehow "absurd", without actually being able to articulate why. Why not just stop participating in the conversation if it's upsetting you so much? You're clearly not getting any benefit from considering different perspectives.
- GabrielMtn 5y ago
  I honestly find it quite humorous at how quickly your accusations of other’s nastiness and bullying, and apologies for hyperbolic rhetoric turns into doubling-down, and worse, deflection from your specious logic with the idea that instead of being an illogical comparison that it surely must just be high above anyone’s head who doesn’t see any congruent logic to it, and that they must just be upset and flustered. That definitely tracks with a person who can’t distinguish the differences between banning the obese from society, and vaccine mandates. Maybe your concern and über-patriotism is lost on my flustered, upset little mind, or maybe it’s just a specious red-herring of a point since you’ve already decided that vaccine mandates are fascistic overreach of government power? I don’t think we can both be right.
  - throwawaylinux 5y ago
    You're upset because you are incapable of forming a coherent response to what I wrote.
    - GabrielMtn 5y ago
      Given you’ve received multiple replies to your point saying it makes little sense and isn’t comparable, maybe the last bastion of “you’re upset because you cannot form a coherent response” isn’t the defense you think it is.
      - throwawaylinux 5y ago
        And I have no need to defend anything from you because you are as yet incapable of a coherent response. Whenever you've calmed down and are ready to try again, I'll be happy to.
- Gabriel_Martin 5y ago
  I'm not sure why my replies got deleted, pretty wack

throwawaylinux 5y ago

> I really don't get what is the glitch here? The glitch? The glitch is getting you to complete your ideas and form a coherent response. > You seem fixated on finding logical parallels to an ongoing response to a global pandemic, which is honestly getting quite repetitive to discuss. I'm fixated because I posted some questions in a covid thread that doesn't mindlessly toe the line, and that's exhausting you? I rather think you would be less upset in the end if you just conceded you don't have good answers. Sometimes it's okay to admit you don't know everything. This flustered incoherent rambling is what's embarrassing and exposes you as incapable of addressing what I wrote just as surely as a simple admission would have. With the additional benefit of the latter being retaining some dignity. The entire thread is here plain as day for anybody to read, and the point is still floating around happily well above your head: > Are we even on the same page here that less deaths is better from the perspective of public policy? So what to do about the overweight person question. I know you're getting flustered and angry because you can't answer it, so you're just pretending it's not relevant or it's somehow "absurd", without actually being able to articulate why. Why not just stop participating in the conversation if it's upsetting you so much? You're clearly not getting any benefit from considering different perspectives.

GabrielMtn 5y ago
I honestly find it quite humorous at how quickly your accusations of other’s nastiness and bullying, and apologies for hyperbolic rhetoric turns into doubling-down, and worse, deflection from your specious logic with the idea that instead of being an illogical comparison that it surely must just be high above anyone’s head who doesn’t see any congruent logic to it, and that they must just be upset and flustered. That definitely tracks with a person who can’t distinguish the differences between banning the obese from society, and vaccine mandates. Maybe your concern and über-patriotism is lost on my flustered, upset little mind, or maybe it’s just a specious red-herring of a point since you’ve already decided that vaccine mandates are fascistic overreach of government power? I don’t think we can both be right.
- throwawaylinux 5y ago
  You're upset because you are incapable of forming a coherent response to what I wrote.
  - GabrielMtn 5y ago
    Given you’ve received multiple replies to your point saying it makes little sense and isn’t comparable, maybe the last bastion of “you’re upset because you cannot form a coherent response” isn’t the defense you think it is.
    - throwawaylinux 5y ago
      And I have no need to defend anything from you because you are as yet incapable of a coherent response. Whenever you've calmed down and are ready to try again, I'll be happy to.
Gabriel_Martin 5y ago
I'm not sure why my replies got deleted, pretty wack