4 ms·
Explain how it isn't a tradeoff. Give me one example that supports your stance please. It's a sliding a scale. You get to move the marker one way or the other.
by CountDrewku 5y ago
Explain how it isn't a tradeoff. Give me one example that supports your stance please.
It's a sliding a scale. You get to move the marker one way or the other. Whatever you do for the "greater good" will inherently remove rights from someone.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- kelseyfrog 5y agoUmm, the right to be free from slavery.
- CountDrewku 5y agoThat took rights and freedom away from certain people. We've all agreed that taking the right to hold slaves away is better for society just like taking the right to murder away is better for society. However, that doesn't mean you didn't take a freedom away from a group of people.
- kelseyfrog 5y agoI'm saying freedom from slavery was an increase in freedom and a greater good. That's the point. A net increase in both. That's why it's a false dichotomy.
- CountDrewku 5y agoThat contradicts absolutely nothing I said. I'm not sure who you're arguing against here. There's no false dichotomy being presented at all.