3 ms·
I don't see why it would be. Just as it is not war now with respect to pollution and might also not be in the future. Before it is being cited: of course, the d
by RandomLensman 5y ago
I don't see why it would be. Just as it is not war now with respect to pollution and might also not be in the future. Before it is being cited: of course, the defense establishment sees risks of war everywhere, including climate - but that is their business.
- esarbe 5y agoThere are already existing tensions and conflicts about resources like water. Some of these do not need much more pushing to escalate into war[0]. Further climatic disruptions will make the already dire situations in many countries untenable. That situations like that do not tend to improve by unilateral actions of their neighbors if the threaten to make a barely acceptable situation even worse. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/the-first-water-war-is-uncomfortably-close-n9bjctvgn https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/the-first-water-war-is-un...