3 ms·
Any performance benchmark? I know it is hard to compare, but I do wonder if it is actually already faster than MongoDB.
by hackandtrip 5y ago
Any performance benchmark? I know it is hard to compare, but I do wonder if it is actually already faster than MongoDB.
- slaymaker1907 5y agoI'm not sure it's really an apples to apples comparison. The big selling point of MongoDB is that it sort of just works out of the box with horizontal scaling while Postgres is much more immature in that area. You could try running https://github.com/mongodb-labs/py-tpcc https://github.com/mongodb-labs/py-tpcc to get an estimate. However, that might not reflect how people actually use MongoDB since TPCC is focused on transactions as opposed to analytics.
- PeterZaitsev 5y agoNote though you have Aurora PostgreSQL as well as CockroachDB and Yugabyte which speak PostgreSQL and may be able to support MangoDB
- james_in_the_uk 5y agoIt’s not an apples to apples comparison it’s a mangoes to mongos one :)
- threeseed 5y agoHighly doubt it. a) MongoDB was the fastest database I had ever tried for many types of use cases e.g. tuple updates and in general significantly faster than b) This is a Go layer in front of PostgreSQL which is fast but not faster than a native C socket server.