4 ms·
I think the difference is there are documents showing Facebook is aware their platform harms teenage children. If Disney did studies that showed their products
by taylorfinley 5y ago
I think the difference is there are documents showing Facebook is aware their platform harms teenage children. If Disney did studies that showed their products were psychologically damaging their consumers I think we would be right in 'witch hunting' them too. Honestly I think marketing to children is predatory in general and it's kind of crazy that we don't have more checks on this.
- jensensbutton 5y agoAs I understand it those same documents showed that actually they mostly _benefit_ teenage children.
- goatlover 5y agoSo you think shows and toys made for children should only be marketed to the parents? What if the kid is alone watching an ad on tv or the internet?