4 ms·
Apologies for posting a comment that doesn't add to the discussion. I was trying to show the absurdity of the quote in the article that someone recommended read
by madiator 5y ago
Apologies for posting a comment that doesn't add to the discussion. I was trying to show the absurdity of the quote in the article that someone recommended reading 500 pages a day.
- groby_b 5y agofwiw, I think it does add to the discussion - especially once removed from the realm of pure quip. Reading 500 pages is a large undertaking. Proficient readers manage ~0.8 pages/minute. That is ~6.5 hours just reading, without any time taken to organize the knowledge. And reading at that speed is extremely hard mental effort, you're pretty much exhausted at the end of it. Sure, they could be an extremely fast reader and get it done in 5 hours. Still, without deeper comprehension, or organization. It very much matters to point out that the recommendation is fundamentally self-aggrandizement more than truth.