I can't speak for more than myself, but here's an alternative viewpoint: as a female that fits into other undisclosed minorities, and as an erotic artist who re

I can't speak for more than myself, but here's an alternative viewpoint: as a female that fits into other undisclosed minorities, and as an erotic artist who regularly gets threats (comes with the package) - I am far more afraid of the consequences of this dystopian line of thinking than I am of the occasional hate mobs. There are tools out there to deal with mobs/threats, even if it's unpleasant, but giving puritans a legal leverage to take down my art (and anyone who's creative work is remotely controversial) is going to wreck an unholy amount of damage. The typical line of attack is claiming that our art is "harmful" because of BDSM content, and the proposed legistlation would just reinforce that. I feel like you mean the best in your heart, but would encourage anyone to think deeply before white knighting for minorities. A lot of times well meaning laws can have disastrous consequences in smothering less-powerful voices (laws against "immoral" content referring to anything sexual online regularly making things worse for actual sex workers, for instance). The ACLU has a long list of historical incidences where "legal" censorship ended up hurting civil rights activists, queer activists and creatives, and too many other groups to name.