>The San Francisco Police generally don't do anything to stop deranged homeless... I don't know that that's true, but I think it's pretty clear that homeless,

>The San Francisco Police generally don't do anything to stop deranged homeless... I don't know that that's true, but I think it's pretty clear that homeless, mentally ill drug addicts are a different problem. >The point is that there is no universal worldwide standard of tolerable behavior These arguments always baffle me, as they essentially suggest that nothing means anything and we have no way of determining what a civilized, functioning society should look like. Yet, here we are — with laws and everything. There's a reasonableness standard applied to these things. We apply it for every scenario where gray areas exist. It's also why we have judges, juries and a court system. >Would you be happy if the laws of Saudi Arabia or North Korea were enforced online? I'm missing how the laws of Saudi Arabia or North Korea have anything to do with this case in the UK or a hypothetical one in the US.