The issue is important and needs to be discussed (both sides - which doesn't mean solving it at the 'chat level' is the right answer, of course). And I'm glad t

The issue is important and needs to be discussed (both sides - which doesn't mean solving it at the 'chat level' is the right answer, of course). And I'm glad the Pirates "get" the internet. But the fud is getting old Realistically, targeted chat grooming on a major platform does end with responsibility over the platform. If the system is BS then it should be trivial to get the chat of any of the politicians involved in approving this. But from the past proposals, it doesn't look like that is "too trivial". While technical folks think the tech world is untouchable by laws the legislative folks think everything is "perfectly" amenable to legislation and of course they're both wrong and the truth lies somewhere in the middle. The most likely end result is that messaging for minors might have the monitoring (but remember Google, FB, etc already do this in a way). And of course even if it passes this is amenable to ECJ appeals, etc.