> it'll likely stabilize itself given enough time. Is there more to this argument? Because it could well stabilize at "palm trees at the poles". Or it might n

> it'll likely stabilize itself given enough time. Is there more to this argument? Because it could well stabilize at "palm trees at the poles". Or it might never stabilize because of ever-increasing CO2 production (compared to sequestration). "There could be an equilibrium" really isn't an argument imo.