3 ms·
> I didn’t make any claim that can actually be proven. Correct, your claim “There’s no conspiracy here” is something you don’t know and can’t prove, therefore
by dahart 5y ago
> I didn’t make any claim that can actually be proven.
Correct, your claim “There’s no conspiracy here” is something you don’t know and can’t prove, therefore is an unjustifiable claim.
- endisneigh 5y agoSaying there's no conspiracy is not a claim, that's the default position. Look up "null hypothesis" and "burden of proof."
- dahart 5y ago> Saying there’s no conspiracy is not a claim You fooled me. I’m fine with your later “there’s no evidence of a conspiracy.” But saying “there’s no conspiracy” is indeed a claim in casual speech. The potential evidence of a conspiracy is that the professors were denied permission to testify, when, as you point out, they’ve been allowed in the past. What changed?
- endisneigh 5y agoWe'll have to see what the result of the lawsuit is and the ensuing discovery to know.