For instancce, here's an example of a HN thread from two years ago, on an article on "fighting back" against AMP (!), in which the top comment: > I worked on a

For instancce, here's an example of a HN thread from two years ago, on an article on "fighting back" against AMP (!), in which the top comment: > I worked on amp for a leading newspaper, and everyone who says that amp is about "making the web faster on mobile" is either very naive or doing marketing for google. —https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21712733 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21712733 I guess that user was... right? There's a reply disputing it, in part, although even the replyer seemed to accept that Google had ulterior motives, they just weren't willing to accept that Google would actually make the web slower and lie about it to achieve their ulterior motives... > Of course AMP has other motives than simply making the web faster for mobile, but it also does make the web faster for mobile