> in their opinion they are allowed to put the "gate down" for some users on a public website. If they want to, the only reasonable way is to inform the visito

> in their opinion they are allowed to put the "gate down" for some users on a public website. If they want to, the only reasonable way is to inform the visitor they're not eligible to use the site unless they fulfill specific conditions. If the user knowingly ignores this information - this is reasonable to be interpreted as some sort of offense depending on the context. IP-based segregation, however, is just bullshit.