5 ms·
As a dog owner there's a good point mixed up with a lot of faulty assumptions in this article. Some points I believe the author is wrong about: If given a cho
by nickthemagicman 5y ago
As a dog owner there's a good point mixed up with a lot of faulty assumptions in this article.
Some points I believe the author is wrong about:
If given a choice, Dogs prefer the exact lifestyle the author is deriding.
If you've ever had an outdoor dog on
a lot of land, that's free to roam, they run briefly occasionally, then return to the home/den to sleep most of of the day. And if the owner is around depending on the dogs personality they'll typically spend it around the owner.
This is what dogs prefer.
The author is using the human version of Maslow's hierarchy to claim that dogs need fulfilling work and meaning to exist.
Dogs don't need to be 'working' to live happy fulfilling lives. Feral dogs aren't wandering around herding or retrieving things.
Dogs are animals and as long as they have food, excercise, some other dogs to socialize with and the pack alpha is happy with them that is the peak of their Maslow hierarchy of needs.
Only humans need filling work to do to be happy. Every other animal in nature is happy to just survive day to day and have companionship and the ability to explore their environment.
----
This is the only thing I think the author is correct about:
Dogs are a lot of work. They require a lot of excercise. Dogs that are left in apartments all day with a 15 minute walk is borderline abuse.
No one tells dog owners this though.
Dogs need a lot of socializing.
I take mine to the Dog park for an hour at least socializing daily.
Alot of cities have bar/dog parks so the humans and the dogs can both socialize.
Doggy daycare is a great option as well when you're not going to be home and have to leave the dog alone.
Dogs are extremely simple:
If you can spend time with them and get them both excercise(mental and physical) and playtime with other dogs...that's the peak of what they need. Theyre not living an unfulfilling existence because they can't start that cappuccino stand they've always dreamed of.
However a lot of dog owners are not aware of this and treat their dog like furniture or clothing accessory and this is where the problems the author was talking about coming to play.
- VHRanger 5y ago> No one tells dog owners this though. Uh, the barest of a 15sec google search, or the first minute of any halfway decent Youtube article mentions all you talk about It's very much 101 stuff. People missing that basic knowledge are at fault here.
- SOLAR_FIELDS 5y agoI think one of the sentiments very prevalent in the comments but not explicitly pointed out is that a lot of people agree that dog ownership is not the problem, but that irresponsible dog ownership is the problem. If, then, that is the case, why do we make it incredibly easy as a society to walk down to the store and obtain one? Wouldn't better regulations around dog ownership, breeding and sale be a good first step towards resolving some of these ethical qualms?
- VHRanger 5y agoYes, and reasonable places have them. This is why we neuter dogs, primarily (population control and backyard breeder nightmare control) Some places have reasonable laws RE: dog ownership restrictions.
- SOLAR_FIELDS 5y agoCan you give an example of a place that has reasonable laws regarding things like dog ownership restrictions that deal with the issues discussed in the article?
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]