3 ms·
From a viability perspective they might not have had a choice —but they could at least have put up a fight. Overture, which they acquired, did paid ranking, wh
by mc32 5y ago
From a viability perspective they might not have had a choice —but they could at least have put up a fight.
Overture, which they acquired, did paid ranking, which is reminiscent of AOLs keyword(s).
If Google had stuck to their ideals, someone would have come around and commercialized the idea (as Google did).
The tragedy is Google didn’t try to stall all out commercialization but rather doubled down on it.
Initially they may have been afraid of becoming the AltaVista, the best, but usurped by someone better because they weren’t investing gigantic profits back into it to assure dominance.
In the end they became the monster they feared, and not a docile one at that.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- marginalia_nu 5y agoI think the main reason they've gone down the route they have is a lack of competition to keep them honest. Microsoft tried with Bing, but it was too little and much too late. DDG has helped a bit even if it's mostly rebranded Bing-data, but we're still far away from having a healthy search ecosystem.