2 ms·
From kvark himself, big fan of your work :) Very interesting, thanks for saying this, I wouldn't have thought SPIRV->Target could be faster than or near the sam
by slimsag 5y ago
From kvark himself, big fan of your work :) Very interesting, thanks for saying this, I wouldn't have thought SPIRV->Target could be faster than or near the same speed as WGSL->Target.
I guess with compression probably being quite good, as well, there isn't much point of a SPIRV extension for download times or processing times?