Well I don't think it was explained what the injustice is, so I'm sorry I still just don't understand. You mentioned that some people were punished but without

Well I don't think it was explained what the injustice is, so I'm sorry I still just don't understand. You mentioned that some people were punished but without really going into detail, and then I wasn't able to even see how that was related to the article. If I missed something please explain it, if you feel like it. But I don't think a bigger sample size would be convincing here because the existing samples didn't have enough information. Does that make sense? I've disagreed with people many times and faced fallout from it, and I wouldn't call it an injustice. In fact most of the time when I actually thought about why people were upset at me, and I listened to what they had to say, it turned out that I was the one who was in the wrong.