Abbot made an analogy because of limited similarities relevant to his argument and did not suggest a moral equivalence. The offense-taking is disingenuous and h

Abbot made an analogy because of limited similarities relevant to his argument and did not suggest a moral equivalence. The offense-taking is disingenuous and histrionic. As is your insinuation that Abbot has concealed racist opinions -- a baseless slander which is frankly more objectively morally offensive than what Abbot said.