48 ms·
I. AM. NOT. SUGGESTING. TO. USE. INFECTIONS. TO. GET. IMMUNITY. :) I'm only considering already acquired immunity from past infections. And I've given an exam
by radu_floricica 5y ago
I. AM. NOT. SUGGESTING. TO. USE. INFECTIONS. TO. GET. IMMUNITY.
:)
I'm only considering already acquired immunity from past infections. And I've given an example on how that's relevant. It's probably another example of polarization that you're assuming almost by default that I'm an enemy anti-vaxxer (I'm not). Oh well, nothing else to do that to keep talking, and hoping civilized conversation helps.
- Arnt 5y agoI didn't assume that you did. Rather, I thought you were interested comparing kinds of immunity. To to that fairly and well, you need to include the most common case: People's first infection. Remember that most people's immune system is able to learn quickly enough that natural immunity takes care of the first infection without external help. The immune reaction doesn't start with the second infection, it starts as soon as the immune system starts learning. Excluding the first infection in an analysis seems very, very strange to me.