3 ms·
That wasn't the point being made. The person I was responding to explicitly said that sniffing dogs are secretly trained to respond to handler gestures. They're
by betwixthewires 5y ago
That wasn't the point being made. The person I was responding to explicitly said that sniffing dogs are secretly trained to respond to handler gestures. They're claiming that drug sniffing dogs are a charade, basically, and I used a shining example of their lack of knowledge on this topic to demonstrate a valid dismissal of their point.
Are dogs used to get warrants fraudulently? The answer is absolutely. It happens all the time. But the idea that sniffing dogs are fake is ridiculous, they are carefully trained so as to not respond to handler wishes (dog trainers are aware of this trait also BTW), deliberately signalled or otherwise, even though sometimes they might do so. And making the simple claim that they bark is enough for me to know that someone making authoritative statements on the topic hasn't a clue what they're talking about.
- deepsun 5y agoSomething is broken in logic conclusions. Let me resolve: > The person I was responding to explicitly said that sniffing dogs are secretly trained to respond to handler gestures. Yes, I did say that. > They're claiming that drug sniffing dogs are a charade No, I did not say that. > Are dogs used to get warrants fraudulently? The answer is absolutely. It happens all the time. Yep, my point. > But the idea that sniffing dogs are fake is ridiculous. Nowhere I claimed that sniffing dogs are fake. So we seem to agree on everything. Thank you, resolved the confusion.