> OK, so you brought in some unquantified covid effects that you then said are irrelevant. I agree, they are irrelevant because they are too rare. I didn’t say

> OK, so you brought in some unquantified covid effects that you then said are irrelevant. I agree, they are irrelevant because they are too rare. I didn’t say they were irrelevant. They’re relevant to your argument that vaccination has only downsides. Pfizer doesn’t need to do independent research on this, the committee was already aware and discussing the known risks of covid to children as part of their evaluation of this application. The rest of your post seems to be mostly speculation about VE against severe infection waning relatively rapidly in the future despite it not having done so yet. > being faced with medicine that lost its effectiveness over a long period of time earlier in life to the point of being a wash, I'm less enthused about boosting on a regular basis. Meanwhile I’ve got a flu shot every year for a decade. No side effects and I’ve been protected from flu without issue. So far it’s looking like we won’t need such frequent boosters for coronavirus though.