4 ms·
I disagree. Alphabet has no clear connection to their current or future business plans. They don't even own alphabet.com. Meta on the other hand is the best pos
by duud 5y ago
I disagree. Alphabet has no clear connection to their current or future business plans. They don't even own alphabet.com. Meta on the other hand is the best possible metaverse name and was announced alongside a $10/billion year VR budget. It was a smart rebrand as Instagram and WhatsApp have just as many users as FB and Oculus (now Meta) may soon too.
- Talanes 5y ago> Meta on the other hand is the best possible metaverse name It's not like we all use search.com. Having an on the nose name doesn't necessarily mean having a good one.
- duud 5y agoMeta is more open ended than search.com. It could just as easily be a bar or art gallery as a $100 trillion dollar virtual empire. You are right that a great name can only take you so far, ultimately you have to have a competitive product. Fortunately for Meta they already have a market leading VR product and a $10 billion annual budget to maintain that lead. As someone who has spent several thousand hours studying names and recently bought FB stock, I am delighted with the change.
- Talanes 5y ago>It could just as easily be a bar or art gallery as a $100 trillion dollar virtual empire. "Meta" the bar or art gallery actually makes far more sense than "Meta" the tech company. Search would be a great name for a bar too. Generic industry terms make far more immediate sense when used outside the industry. Meta just feels like a company in 1999 naming itself "Internet." But, it doesn't matter because Facebook has the resources to make any bad idea stick.