5 ms·

>>It's been how long since it launched and I've only ever seen one in the wild that didn't belong to someone affiliated with MSFT. Not a fair comparison: WP7

by rkwz 15y ago

>>It's been how long since it launched and I've only ever seen one in the wild that didn't belong to someone affiliated with MSFT. Not a fair comparison: WP7 was launched in October 21, 2010[1] [2] Android was launched 2 years earlier [3] iOS more than 3 years earlier[4] [1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Phone http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Phone [2]Assuming that you're talking about WP7 and not Windows Mobile [3]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_%28software%29#Hardware http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_%28software%29#Hardware [4]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IOS_%28Apple%29#History http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IOS_%28Apple%29#History edit: Please explain why I'm wrong before downvoting.

technoslut 15y ago
Maybe I'm wrong, but the circumstances are different for WP7 than it was for the iPhone and Android. I don't think that there was going to be any question that the iPhone was going to be a success with the long lines at launch and devs breaking into the OS to get apps to run. With Android, they were the first true competitor to iOS when it came to touch-based phones. With WP7 there doesn't seem to be the enthusiasm for the product. It's a terrific OS but I get the feeling that they're really late to the game. This could all change but I don't think anyone is willing to bet their money or time on it, especially after the swift demise of WebOS.
- cageface 15y ago
  I think the problem for WP7 is that there are now two "good enough" options out there now so all new contenders are going to have to take things a big step forward to attract any interest. From what I've seen of it WP7 isn't enough of an improvement to be genuinely disruptive. And Microsoft's indecisive churn on its development stack lately has got to make developers a little wary.
  - mahyarm 15y ago
    They key to WP7 is that it's a competitor to Android. Apple iOS is not available to OEMs, but Android and WP7 is. If handset OEMs do not have a second choice, they'll have a single external dependency on Google and Google will use it to push them around or Google might screw it up really bad. It's in the OEMs best interest for WP7 to at least become somewhat successful so they themselves have a second option.
    - rednaught 15y ago
      I think we'll see some interesting things play out with the proposed Google purchase of Motorola and Nokia becoming a premier(favored?) WP7/7.5+ partner. In the case of Google, they might be able to set the standard for Android implementations since they'll have vertical integration from hardware to software. We don't know how much Nokia will benefit from their new relationship compared to the other partners. In either case, Google and Microsoft seem to want to follow Apple's complete stack(and don't forget RIM is still in this too who also have a complete stack and a new QNX rtos. Outside of the US, RIM is doing very well) or at least offer the complete stack as an option to customers.
    - technoslut 15y ago
      I wanted to edit because of this but you've described it perfectly. The problem is the MMI purchase. If MS is unable to make Android prohibitively more expensive than WP7 then there is no way they can defeat Google as than alternative.
    - rbanffy 15y ago
      There is no such dependency on Google with Android because it's open source. You don't have to ask them permission or pay them money to build a phone with it. I agree life may be hard if your competitors get the code before you do and that you may want to have a cozy relationship with Google (and cooperate with your competitors on some level) but it's nowhere close to the dependency you get being a WP7 OEM. If I ran a phone maker, I'd keep a WP7 handset or two in the lineup (because there will be people who'll want it) and because I don't like to be cornered. But I'd also keep a team ready to run with Android without Google support, knowing exactly what I'd have to change if I couldn't use Google brands or software. But, again, you don't have to depend on Google like you do with Microsoft. And true great devices come from the careful matching of hardware and software and that's hard to do if you don't get the source code.
      - coob 15y ago
        You need a decent relationship with Google to maintain access to the Marketplace, however.
dstein 15y ago
Take a good hard look at the graph on this article: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/08/16/asay_on_goole_patents_and_apple/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/08/16/asay_on_goole_patent... There are some cold realities that Microsoft is up against here. A half decent "me too" effort that's 4 years late is not going to win a lot of marketshare.
azakai 15y ago
The first Samsung Bada phone was launched in June 2010, a few months before WP7. Bada has been increasing in marketshare since its launch, unlike WP7, and surpasses WP7 (note that Microsoft's marketshare includes the older Windows Mobile as well, I can't find separate figures - so Microsoft's lack of success is even more significant). WP7, so far, is a failure.

by rkwz 15y ago

technoslut 15y ago

Maybe I'm wrong, but the circumstances are different for WP7 than it was for the iPhone and Android. I don't think that there was going to be any question that the iPhone was going to be a success with the long lines at launch and devs breaking into the OS to get apps to run. With Android, they were the first true competitor to iOS when it came to touch-based phones. With WP7 there doesn't seem to be the enthusiasm for the product. It's a terrific OS but I get the feeling that they're really late to the game. This could all change but I don't think anyone is willing to bet their money or time on it, especially after the swift demise of WebOS.

cageface 15y ago
I think the problem for WP7 is that there are now two "good enough" options out there now so all new contenders are going to have to take things a big step forward to attract any interest. From what I've seen of it WP7 isn't enough of an improvement to be genuinely disruptive. And Microsoft's indecisive churn on its development stack lately has got to make developers a little wary.
- mahyarm 15y ago
  They key to WP7 is that it's a competitor to Android. Apple iOS is not available to OEMs, but Android and WP7 is. If handset OEMs do not have a second choice, they'll have a single external dependency on Google and Google will use it to push them around or Google might screw it up really bad. It's in the OEMs best interest for WP7 to at least become somewhat successful so they themselves have a second option.
  - rednaught 15y ago
    I think we'll see some interesting things play out with the proposed Google purchase of Motorola and Nokia becoming a premier(favored?) WP7/7.5+ partner. In the case of Google, they might be able to set the standard for Android implementations since they'll have vertical integration from hardware to software. We don't know how much Nokia will benefit from their new relationship compared to the other partners. In either case, Google and Microsoft seem to want to follow Apple's complete stack(and don't forget RIM is still in this too who also have a complete stack and a new QNX rtos. Outside of the US, RIM is doing very well) or at least offer the complete stack as an option to customers.
  - technoslut 15y ago
    I wanted to edit because of this but you've described it perfectly. The problem is the MMI purchase. If MS is unable to make Android prohibitively more expensive than WP7 then there is no way they can defeat Google as than alternative.
  - rbanffy 15y ago
    There is no such dependency on Google with Android because it's open source. You don't have to ask them permission or pay them money to build a phone with it. I agree life may be hard if your competitors get the code before you do and that you may want to have a cozy relationship with Google (and cooperate with your competitors on some level) but it's nowhere close to the dependency you get being a WP7 OEM. If I ran a phone maker, I'd keep a WP7 handset or two in the lineup (because there will be people who'll want it) and because I don't like to be cornered. But I'd also keep a team ready to run with Android without Google support, knowing exactly what I'd have to change if I couldn't use Google brands or software. But, again, you don't have to depend on Google like you do with Microsoft. And true great devices come from the careful matching of hardware and software and that's hard to do if you don't get the source code.
    - coob 15y ago
      You need a decent relationship with Google to maintain access to the Marketplace, however.

dstein 15y ago

Take a good hard look at the graph on this article: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/08/16/asay_on_goole_patents_and_apple/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/08/16/asay_on_goole_patent... There are some cold realities that Microsoft is up against here. A half decent "me too" effort that's 4 years late is not going to win a lot of marketshare.

azakai 15y ago

The first Samsung Bada phone was launched in June 2010, a few months before WP7. Bada has been increasing in marketshare since its launch, unlike WP7, and surpasses WP7 (note that Microsoft's marketshare includes the older Windows Mobile as well, I can't find separate figures - so Microsoft's lack of success is even more significant). WP7, so far, is a failure.