2 ms·
Frankly I don’t even get the idea why it’s important who exactly forwarded these pics. How is it a deterrent? We know it is Alex, alright. What now? He didn’t s
by wruza 5y ago
Frankly I don’t even get the idea why it’s important who exactly forwarded these pics. How is it a deterrent? We know it is Alex, alright. What now? He didn’t sign no kind of NDA in the chat.
Men could also have this issue, if they made explicit pics which could end up in hands of relatives or something like that. Why is it only girls’ one? The entire watermark thing assumes that it’s not just a private photo, it is one that they send to many people from their nudes arsenal, consciously making them, not accidentally under a feeling of the moment. You know, you’re either the one who made a mistake, or the one who sends nudes regularly and are okay with someone finding that out. Picture yourself in a “good” light and there will be no reason to make it “publicly-private”.
- dragonwriter 5y ago> Frankly I don’t even get the idea why it’s important who exactly forwarded these pics. How is it a deterrent? We know it is Alex, alright. What now? He didn’t sign no kind of NDA in the chat. Copyright doesn't work on a principle of “all rights are granted unless you sign an explicit agreement not to distribute”. Neither for the most part do the laws, in jurisdictions that have them, specifically addressing nonconsensual distribution of private images, nor the more general tort laws on invasion of privacy, etc., that have been applied to similar acts without more specific laws addressing them.