5 ms·
Of course. Think of it in terms of cui bono. You're on the precipice of convincing a bunch of folks they should shut down their economies and give you trillions
by m0zg 5y ago
Of course. Think of it in terms of cui bono. You're on the precipice of convincing a bunch of folks they should shut down their economies and give you trillions of dollars to send to your donors as you please. Then a guy comes along and says that your shit won't work (which will be amply demonstrated in Europe this coming winter) and offers something that actually does work. It's like that meme - the guy will fly straight through the window for suggesting such foolishness. They never were interested in solving the problem, they're interested in trillions of dollars that they'll get control over because the problem exists.
- passerby1 5y agoWinter? What are you talking about, the climate is changing and it's getting warmer! /s
- catlikesshrimp 5y agoWhat is with "The winter is coming" vibe? Your comment is too vague for me to understand.
- m0zg 5y agoDid you not read about the European energy crisis? Here, let me help you out: https://search.brave.com/search?q=european+energy+crisis&source=desktop https://search.brave.com/search?q=european+energy+crisis&sou...
- catlikesshrimp 5y agoI suppose it is my fault for asking about less vagueness. Who is asking for trillions? Who is flying out of a window?
- m0zg 5y ago> Who is asking for trillions? Governments and their owners/political donors. > Who is flying out of a window? Common sense. We could solve climate and achieve net zero carbon in a decade if we focused on 4th gen nuclear. But that's not as profitable to the aforementioned donors, so it ain't happening.
- adrianN 5y agoThe European energy crisis has roughly nothing to do with renewables.