3 ms·
Seymour Hersh basically nailed it at the time and then it was confirmed with the WikiLeaks OPCW dump. All quite easy to find with Google.
by AndrewBissell 5y ago
Seymour Hersh basically nailed it at the time and then it was confirmed with the WikiLeaks OPCW dump. All quite easy to find with Google.
- blendergeek 5y agoI though @1cvmask was arguing that chemical weapons weren't used in Syria. After reading the replies, it seems that they were arguing that the chemical weapons attack was carried out by someone other than Syria. I misunderstood "faked" to mean that no chemical weapons were used rather than that Assad was framed for using chemical weapons.
- jessaustin 5y agoYes those magical bouncing chlorine bombs were another fake story that immediately failed the cui bono? test for anyone who pays attention... so, like, 5% of Americans. https://thegrayzone.com/2021/04/18/at-un-aaron-mate-debunks-opcws-syria-lies-and-confronts-us-uk-on-cover-up/ https://thegrayzone.com/2021/04/18/at-un-aaron-mate-debunks-...
- notriddle 5y agoBecause the “who benefits” test isn’t sufficient to prove anything. It’s a starting point, at best.