3 ms·
Would redesign BGP with more resistance to Byzantine actors. Not so much because many folks announce routes maliciously (though that definitely) happens but bec
by jpgvm 5y ago
Would redesign BGP with more resistance to Byzantine actors. Not so much because many folks announce routes maliciously (though that definitely) happens but because people always manage to screw it up accidentally.
Make it easier and more equitable to obtain addresses and ASNs.
Build protocol to make edge/cloud computing more fungible. Similar to folding@home but more flexible and taking into account networj connectivity rather than just CPU cycles. Probably looks a lot like Cloudflare Workers/Sandstorm but no vendor lockin.
DNSSEC only. TLS only for HTTP/consumer facing web.
Actually on the topic of that probably something simpler than TLS to replace TLS. It has too many features. x509 can stay but the protocol needs reworking for simplicity.
- toast0 5y agoTLS 1.3 is kind of complex, but with less optional stuff is not too bad. X.509 is a nightmare of complexity, but at the same time is inflexible in useful ways. Certificate validation when not every node has the same list of CAs and some CAs are expiring is pretty hard to bulletproof.