4 ms·
That doesn't address the problem of these bots discarding many potentially good resumes because they don't include enough keywords. If the position is only ope
by rtsil 5y ago
That doesn't address the problem of these bots discarding many potentially good resumes because they don't include enough keywords.
If the position is only open to people who worked at a FAANG, then make that clear in the job posting instead of discarding the applications that doesn't have FAANG references. People spend a lot of time building resumes and applying. The least one can do is make the rules clear.
Also, the lying resume goes beyond a false experience. It includes pure nonsense such as AI-based GraphQL, React for AI on Blockchain, connecting with Reid Hoffman on Linkedin and spreading herpes to interns. And the follow-up emails included worse, and the replying bots that pretend to be HR people scheduled a call anyway.
- Kranar 5y agoWe don't know what the position is open to because we have nothing to compare this resume to. Ignoring the fact that it turns out that the resume being paraded about on Twitter is NOT the resume that was sent out to all of the companies (the spreading herpes and other absurdities was not in the resume that got the 90% response rate), we don't know what this resume is being compared to in order to judge whether these companies are turning down potentially qualified candidates or not.
- Brian_K_White 5y agoIn other words, the hr departments are lying by pretending to be people, and by asking for applications and then not evaluating them. It's perfectly fair to treat them like they treat everyone else.