Point accepted. Yeah technology isn't necessary, but if tech can do the same amount for the same cost removing much of the labor requirement then that's a treme

Point accepted. Yeah technology isn't necessary, but if tech can do the same amount for the same cost removing much of the labor requirement then that's a tremendous win. Additionally the lower the cost the easier it is to append a welfare or socialist cost on the the tax payer's bill. Providing decent food, housing, and some minimal healthcare at 5% of GDP vs 40% of a nations GDP makes a world of difference. At thresholds of 5% combined with high automation mean such social programs won't be as vehemently contested and their absence might even be viewed as a unnecessary cruelty. Some mutant hybrid of what the Sihks do in India, and these automations might be interesting: https://mobile.twitter.com/TechAmazing/status/1439748995916632066 https://mobile.twitter.com/TechAmazing/status/14397489959166... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byDmDWq7wc8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byDmDWq7wc8 + a quick google of food factory gifs/videos A hybrid mutant that maximizes yield, minimizes cost and labor, if such a permutation is realistic and technology-wise permitting. Socialism partially generates such an antagonistic response (at least in the USA) because how much of a burden it is on others, Minimize that burden might change the fundamental collective consciousness to how people view what the government should provide.