5 ms·
You've been down-voted, but you're absolutely correct in some situations. Sure, answering those questions with "this is a great opportunity to learn how to rea
by rablackburn 5y ago
You've been down-voted, but you're absolutely correct in some situations.
Sure, answering those questions with "this is a great opportunity to learn how to read the documentation" is the "right" response.
But I think we've all experienced the frustration of trying to write something in a language we don't use every day, and 'wasting' our time looking up simple things ("okay, what's the exact syntax of a for-loop in this language again?") that just adds friction when we're trying to solve a problem. There's a reason programmers complain so much about being interrupted.
Part of being a good teacher is being able to make those points of friction disappear and enable your students to "get it" and experience the joy of solving a problem.
Don't let perfect be the enemy of good. How many kids would play football/soccer if you were only allowed to play a match with regulation numbers of players on each side, and stopping play every time someone didn't have 'perfect' form?
- Jtsummers 5y agoI suspect they were downvoted because the initial commenter didn't say they only answered questions with questions or that they never provided more traditional instruction. GP is arguing against something that wasn't even said.