So I think the value of a signed book (which I agree in itself is dubious) is based in the provable history and scarcity of the artifact. You know that this in

So I think the value of a signed book (which I agree in itself is dubious) is based in the provable history and scarcity of the artifact. You know that this individual copy of the book you are holding was touched by the author themself. There is something romantic about that, and you have something nobody else has. With an NFT, your "copy" of the actual work is totally indistinguishable from every other. The whole concept of ownership here is also incredibly abstract. I'm not saying there will never be a legitimate use case for something like an NFT, but I think we haven't seen it yet.