4 ms·
I think you are right about this. Life may have had less of what we think of as "work" now. The part that I think is interesting is, as we progressed technolog
by britch 5y ago
I think you are right about this. Life may have had less of what we think of as "work" now.
The part that I think is interesting is, as we progressed technologically, where did that time non-conventional working time go? It used to take hours to clean your home, prepare food, etc. We have modern technology which made it easier. How are people spending that new "free" time?
I think the answer seems to be that technology has essentially freed more time for people to work for someone else. The "advancement" means you spend less time washing clothes, but more time flipping burgers or delivering food.
I think this points to something interesting about how much the lowest earners in a society get paid. While it is true that they get paid what the market will bear, the minimum value is always just enough to survive on. "Time saving" technology has effectively devalued their wages. The cost of staying alive is less than it was before. They must work more for the same outcome.
I'm someone who likes to think automation and technology can make people's lives better in the abstract, but... maybe technology alone cannot accomplish this
- gbronner 5y agoWe have automatic dishwashers now. During WW1, a relative of mine was sent from the city to help on a farm. After dinner, the family lined up all the platters and plates and put them outside, where a herd of hungry cats would lick them clean. Presumably they were rinsed afterwards, but nobody ever told me. There are qualitative differences in results independent of time savings...