> More importantly, there is no value in you, me, or any layman without an even undergraduate-level understanding of math and physics questioning anything that

> More importantly, there is no value in you, me, or any layman without an even undergraduate-level understanding of math and physics questioning anything that you don't know a single thing about. It's not something "I don't know a single thing about". I know some things about it. Perhaps I could observe (since we're on the topic of what people don't know) that you don't actually know what I do and don't know. > You don't even know what you don't know, I cheerfully concede that the number of things I don't know is infinite. > and despite your claims of humility, your earlier writings clearly demonstrated either incredible arrogance, naivety, or both. If it's "incredible", then you would appear to have a problem; it seems that you are convinced by my demonstration of arrogance and naivety, even though it's not believable to you. Make up your mind. I've not insulted anyone; all I've done is to question certain ideas. You, on the other hand, have written a long comment that consists of nothing but personal insults, and contains no information. Back in the Usenet days, one would have said <plonk>.