We celebrate "science", but we skip the scientific method. Observational studies, unreprodcible experiments, and non-falsifiable models have taken over. Not ju

We celebrate "science", but we skip the scientific method. Observational studies, unreprodcible experiments, and non-falsifiable models have taken over. Not just taken over in pop science, but actual scientific fields. So can we really blame judges and juries for taking a few intellectual short cuts? Yes, I suppose we can, because an individual is at risk and we should expect better. But the scientific community should take some blame for compromising on the core of science while continuing to fly the banner of science.