3 ms·
No they aren't, though they like to try to make people feel this way. Again, I'm not sure how you can consider a company with a market cap of over 40 billion,
by DannyBee 5y ago
No they aren't, though they like to try to make people feel this way.
Again, I'm not sure how you can consider a company with a market cap of over 40 billion, and making 1.7 billion in revenue, some sort of "underdog competing against giants".
In their space, it's more like giants bumping each other around.
- netr0ute 5y ago> a company with a market cap of over 40 billion, and making 1.7 billion in revenue That's basically the definition of an underdog if you have a fraction of the number of resources (employees).
- DannyBee 5y agoWell, i mean, technically the definition of an underdog is ": a loser or predicted loser in a struggle or contest" Which is not about the resources at all but about viewpoint on success. So i'm going to say "no, it's not basically the definition of an underdog". Even in slang, you aren't an underdog if you could have whatever you need, but choose not to. You might be one if you need something, don't have the resources to get it, and have to make do anyway. That is not the case for Roku - they could hire as many people as they like.