3 ms·
Huh? I don’t get your point? No vaccine provider has ever taken liability which is why we have the vaccine National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. The
by sjg007 5y ago
Huh? I don’t get your point? No vaccine provider has ever taken liability which is why we have the vaccine National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. The threat of lawsuits is not the only nor the best way to enforce quality. In fact we have regulations and the FDA for this reason.
- ThunderSizzle 5y agoLiability isn't something to take. A liability exists as the nature that there is a cost that someone else is responsible for. E.g. if I start a fire in my kitchen, even unintentially, and it spreads to another's home (or apartment), I'm liable for the damaged of that fire to those affected by the fire. I can't just say "oh, you can't sue me. I don't take liability". But I can lobby the government to say "you can't sue him" which is what these vaccine companies did and continue to do.
- sjg007 5y agoLiability is defined by the law.
- ThunderSizzle 5y agoLiability is a concept. If the vaccines cause you harm, then the vaccine company is liable. And as with all concepts, yes - they are defined by laws and statues so that society can function and the rules of the game can be determined. Vaccine companies changed their rules so they don't play the liability game like everyone else. Maybe fast food restaurants shouldn't be liable when they poison people too?