3 ms·
So do you think it's completely impossible that you would be part of the 2/3rd that found the fake suspect guilty? I don't think basic comprehension or reasonin
by boomboomsubban 5y ago
So do you think it's completely impossible that you would be part of the 2/3rd that found the fake suspect guilty? I don't think basic comprehension or reasoning prevent you from falling for these kinds of arguments, and rather than try to limit possible jurors we should just bar unscientific evidence.
- giantg2 5y agoWho makes the rules for the aptitude? Who decides if it's scientific or not, and what the limit is (p .1 or .001, study design, etc)? The people running the system makes the rules. The general attitude is to treat the law enforcement side more favorably than the defendant, to the point that they are basically assumed guilty from the start.