> In this case, the trade didn’t even violate the intended behavior of systems involved. This is clearly a false statement. The people who set up the system d

> In this case, the trade didn’t even violate the intended behavior of systems involved. This is clearly a false statement. The people who set up the system did NOT intend to allow others to take $130 million for nothing. The point was that their code did not express their intentions 100% correctly, and that's because that is quite hard to do.