> And we see that it clearly has a very negative impact overall so idk what kind of argument is that. You're talking about AC? Surely the climate dialogue hasn

> And we see that it clearly has a very negative impact overall so idk what kind of argument is that. You're talking about AC? Surely the climate dialogue hasn't devolved to the point of "uses energy == bad". We can reflect on its role in shaping society/living spaces and its costs and benefits without being so reductionist.